Proposal Argument Essay

Licensing for ad hominem trainers legitimizing the profession. In its throw form, personalized pedagogy only dates c ein truth lieu song a few decades, yet it is among the fastest growing professions in the U. S. (Holt). In the 80s and 90s personal trainers were predominantly overburdened lifters who looked desire they could soon compete in a bodybuilding contest. The herculean physique automatic exclusivelyy strung-out each of them as guru in the fitness world and helped quickly build a knobele.Towards the late-90s, the situation started to change gyms became less(prenominal) and less of an intimidating environment for a wide category of mass with no desire to become huge. Personal trainers of a wise genesis expanded their specialization to weight loss, cardio vascular wellness, toning and general fitness which make prep bedness itself to a greater extent accessible for all age groups, pile with diametric skill levels and special requirements. As a presidency i ssue. , the trainers demarcation today has become very complex and goes much farther instruction manual during a organizeout posing.It cant be successfully performed without a strong haveledge of anatomy, kinesiology, program development and even psychology You volition assume that someone who guides and assists you in developing wellness and fitness moldiness be a specialist in this ara of knowledge. Of course hardly now do you know that one can become a advised personal trainer by taking an online test for less than one hundred dollars? Its true Competence and skill level of many trainers you chink at health clubs and gyms is low and they are trustedly not cost the money spent.Moreover, your health is under potential risk The solution to this caper can be achieved through a required licensing of personal trainers just like other health/ medical exam professionals. This would benefit both the semipublic and the personal training profession. As a fitness trainer for over seven days, I truly suppose that our industry desperately demand more regulations. My background in gymnastics in addition to twain certifications from Wellness Academy (Russia) and International Sports Science Association (USA) surely micturate me a big advantage over someone who spent $69.95 and a couple weeks learning all the nitty-gritty of personal training to withstand so called ExpertRating Online Certification (Personal Training Certification).So you may think the less my competitors know the better my serve look in comparison with their. No, its not that easy I would rather have a strong contest than constantly disprove common position about personal trainers as mass with weak knowledge base who flirt with thickenings, bark orders and very practically behave unprofessionally.A few condemnations I trained people who had bad experience with a trainer in the past and it matt-up like I had to break the wall of apprehension and dis practice originally they to ok me seriously. Not only I had to defend myself in some ways but there were also financial consequences when clients refused to pay me upfront (usually a client prepays for a package of sessions) and thats why I got pay on session-by-session basis with no commitment from clients side. I personally know a few trainers who collected money for the training and disappeared while their clients have been left with nothingTherefore, such a rule like licensing could be a very effective control promoter for the industry and could hold open trainers accountable for their actions. From clients perspective, mandatory licensing can become a guarantee of receiving a high quality service safe and cost-effective workout. Nancy Howard, a health professional and a Certified Running Coach, situates in her article Poll Should Personal Trainers Be Licensed When we place our trust in those who will come up to us on the proper travel guidebook to reclaiming our health and fitness, it is import ant that we have full disclosure of their qualifications.Her words performer a lot in todays situation, when many people seeking for personal trainers help have some sort of health issue that limit their ability to perform certain movements or fictional character of physical activity. I had the opportunity to work with clients who had knee replacements, severe layer of scoliosis, arthritis, diabetes, past injuries and so on. You can easily hurt a client or worsen an existing condition by using opposed exercising techniques and approaches. Once Ive seen a trainer who made his smart client with swayback (lordosis) do multiple low back habits with evidentiary weight.With such a spine condition you have to be passing helpful when perform any activity involving low back and essential primarily focus on strengthening your abdominal muscles and back of the thighs in order to balance the inward curvature of spine. As a result of that unconsidered workout the client had extreme ba ck pains and firm to s gratuity training. Not only this could be prevented if a trainer had more knowledge about lordosis (which is pretty easy to determine), but the client would be able to improve his back condition with appropriate exercise routine.This example shows that some certification organizations fail to provide the market with well-qualified and knowledgeable professionals. They are not regulated by state and often offer take-home or on-online tests which objectivity is questionable. Licensing, on the other side, factor a across the nation standardized test and leaves no place for cheating. It is fire to note that Howard makes a comparison between personal trainers and other health professionals like Registered Nurses, Licensed Vocational Nurses, Physical Therapists and Registered Dietitians who required to be commissioned by the state which they practice.According to her, there is no reason why personal trainers should be treated any various as their services belo ngs to the aforesaid(prenominal) field (Howard). In my opinion, this analogy is more than appropriate considering that clients are give almost as much for a private training session as for the one-hour massage or a visit to dietician. Moreover, Howard mentions two arouse points in favor of the licensing. First, it will facilitate referrals from traditional health care providers, and, secondly, the insurance companies will be more likely to reimburse for services if personal trainers are licensed (Howard).This misbegottens more people would be able to afford training that is safe and effective. Clearly, the transformation of personal training industry wont be easy. Joe Cannon (personal trainer, author and health educator) states that a government mandated fitness license might also mean an end to fitness organizations all together. At the present moment, there are dozens of certifying fitness organizations within US and, for obvious reasons, they are resisting to proposed ordin ance changes.If personal trainers needed a license Cannon says then all fitness organizations would come under the jurisdiction of the government and the licensing would be standardized. I understand how much multimillion dollar certification business would be change but new market conditions will automatically eliminate companies like ExpertRating Online Certification and increase the entrance barrier into the profession. Im sure strong certification organizations like NASM, ACE, IFTA, ACMS and a few others would find their place in the restructured industry although they will fight against licensing to the last breath.As a interdict factor of licensing Cannon mentions that each trainer would be paying the government every year or so to maintain their license thats in addition to what they pay for fitness continuing education classes. Of course, no one would be happy about it but the level of discontented will depend on the amount of a fee. Im already paying about 500-600 do llars every two years to keep my certification valid and another 400 dollars for insurance so if the new expense would stay within the same range there shouldnt be a problem. Another concern regarding potential licensing of personal trainers is difficulties in its obtaining.Senate Bill 2164 (Fitness nonrecreational Licensing Act) proposed in New jersey in 2008 requires a licensure To complete an canonical course of study of not less than 300 in-person classroom hour. which shall include not less than 50 hours of an unpaid internship in the presence of and under the direct supervision of, a licensed fitness professional, which internship shall be provided by the drill providing the approved course of study and (b) have passed an examination administered or approved by the board or (2) possess an associates or bachelors degree in physical education, exercise science, exercise physiology or bighearted fitness.(S2164) The majority of fitness professionals community finds this bill inappropriate for experienced and qualified trainers who are in the business for years. It basically means they would have to go back to school and put their clients aside for a while. I personally know a few trainers without a degree but with years of work in the field and several certifications of all kinds. There are no doubts about their qualification Nevertheless according to the Fitness Professional Licensing Act these people would need 50 hours of unpaid internship which is absolutely pie-eyedJoe Stein, president of Renaissance Fitness & Wellness Inc. , also expresses his negative opinion about the bill by saying that the New Jersey state senate is trying to balance the bloated state budget on the backs of personal trainers and their clients (Halvorson). On the other side, proposed legislation requirements establish a comprehensive educational program for people entering the field.Therefore beginner trainers would not only have a strong theoretical skillsbut a real life work experience in the gym. There is no such certification at the present moment that can offer internship or any kind of workshop unless you are ready to pay another 600 dollars on top of the certification cost. Despite all advantages that licensing can potentially bring into the personal training industry, proposed legislation in New Jersey, Maryland and Georgia in 2008 achieved no success (State Licensing of Personal Trainers Update December 2008).The bill doesnt consider existing circumstances of the profession and is unrealistic at its present format. However, National Board of Fitness Examiners started to work on one nationally standardized examination process in lieu of 50 different state board exams (State Licensing of Personal Trainers Update December 2008). So when the time is right it can be used by states and will repeal a possibility when the exams could be developed by people removed the profession (State Licensing of Personal Trainers Update December 2008).After all, I strongly believe that licensing is necessary in personal training business as it legitimizes the profession. I want to be recognized as a specialist in the eyes of potential clients and people in a health/medical field. From the business owners perspective, licensing would be extremely helpful in finding properly educated and experienced trainers whose work can determine to the high standards that I set for my clients.